The earth and the tribes of the Ecuadorian rain forest are on their last legs as big oil threatens to destroy both. Backed by the Ecuadorian govt who said they would use force on the tribes who try to defend their way of life along with the rain forests, new drill cites continue to be built at an alarming rate.
Soon there will be no people on the planet earth who are not slaves to one state government or another. This short cited view will bring all of our destruction.
THIS INFURIATES ME,I FEEL ENRAGED BY WHAT I SEE IN THIS VIDEO!!! This beautiful forest land is worth much more than fucking money! Sometime I think the human species has become a plague to this planet!?
TELL THOSE IDIOTS TO STOPP NOT JUST TO STOPP DESTROYING THE FOREST WITH IDIOTICAL MODERN RUBBISH BUT ALSO TO LEAVE THE TRIBES ALONE NOT TO KILL TORTURE OR STEAL FROM THEM *!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!?
JESUS CHRIST.. STOP IT ALREADY!!!!!! I AM A SOUTHERN BOY FROM THE UNITED STATES, WHO WAS BROUGHT UP APPRECIATING AND LOVING NATURE, HAVING THE PLEASURE TO GROW UP ON 2000 ACRES OF PURE HARDWOOD BEAUTY, WITH A BEAUTIFUL RIVER RUNNING THROUGH ALL OF OUR LAND..
I BEG OF GOD TO STOP THIS, I BEG OF THE WORLD’S LEADERS TO STOP THIS.. HAVE WE GOTTEN SO FAR IN OUR GREED THAT HUMAN LIFE, AND ANCIENT HISTORY, AND ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL PLACES ON EARTH MEAN NOTHING!!!!!!!?????? ?
Fuck the Greedy corporate Basterds and Slippery Backstabbing politicians… in this real world they expand franchises and destroy diversity……..they all deserve to rot in HELL in the afterlife……
We have found ways to replace oil with new technologies this is evil greed
in reply to truther04
They are destroying our Beautiful planet what is insanely wrong with them money is it well you can’t live on money alone , your killing everything on Land and Sea , my god wake up people of this planet now please help save it before its to late , we should be living here in harmony with nature , Love and much Peace to allWe have found ways to replace oil with new technologies this is evil greed
in reply to Paul C
and how long can they do that when the rain forests that support life on earth die?
in reply to macjc5
Christ! God no! You and I are not killers so long we’re actually supporting the living rights of the rainforests, the companies are the killers and the governments all over the world Not us.
Crude: The $8.6 Billion Verdict Against Chevron for Polluting Ecuador
Dumping billions of gallons of toxic waste into the Amazon, Texaco (now Chevron) has been ordered to pay $8 billion to clean up its environmental pollution of reckless oil drilling and restore human rights for the 30,000 affected peoples.
Chevron REFUSES to pay the verdict of this 18 year long lawsuit – reflecting the true nature of corporate accountability in the fossil fuel industry.
“Chevron’s strategy in recent years has been, ‘we’ll bleed the plaintiffs dry,’ ” said Robert Percival, director of the environmental law program at the University of Maryland. ” ‘The plaintiffs will run out of money, and we’ll be able to settle really cheaply, or they’ll just go away.’ ” (sfgate.com)
Crude is a must-watch documentary by Joe Berlinger that exposes the true dangers of oil extraction. Everyone should know this information. Please support the filmmakers.
Fossil fuel extraction is common world wide and massively pollutes our fresh water supplies and our environment (see my other videos for the impact of other fossil fuels and more on the world wide water crisis).
Original Trailer at:
*Note* I am not affiliated with the film makers or production company.
The True Story of Chevron’s Ecuador Disaster
Over three decades of oil drilling in the Ecuadorian Amazon, Chevron dumped more than 18 billion gallons of toxic wastewater into the rainforest, leaving local people suffering a wave of cancers, miscarriages and birth defects.
Now, with the support of an international campaign for justice, the communities affected by Chevron’s negligence are holding one of the world’s largest oil companies to account.
‘Just a Bunch of Smoke and Mirrors and Bulls**t’–Crude Film Outtake (CRS195-05-CLIP-01A)
The following is an outtake from Joe Berlinger’s movie Crude. At the March 4, 2007, lunch meeting between plaintiffs’ lead U.S. lawyer Steven Donziger and plaintiffs’ U.S. consultants Charles Champ, Ann Maest and Richard Kamp, they reveal the truth about plaintiffs’ lack of evidence and their intent to manipulate the Ecuadorian court.
Maest tells Donziger that they need evidence of groundwater contamination, because plaintiffs did not submit any. Maest admits that, “Right now all the reports are saying it’s just at the pits and the stations, and nothing has spread anywhere at all.” Donziger responds, “Hold on a second, you know, this is Ecuador. … You can say whatever you want, and at the end of the day, there’s a thousand people around the courthouse.
You’re going to get what you want. Sorry, but it’s true.” Donziger continues, “Because at the end of the day, this is all for the court just a bunch of smoke and mirrors and bulls**t. It really is. We have enough, to get money, to win.” View more outtakes at YouTube.com/TexacoEcuador. For more information about the Ecuador lawsuit, visit Chevron.com/Ecuador.
The Fraudulent Case Against Chevron in Ecuador- An Introduction to Aguinda v. Chevron
This video, developed by Chevron, provides an overview of facts about its subsidiary Texaco Petroleum Company’s operations in Ecuador and the fraudulent lawsuit against the company. For more information about the Ecuador lawsuit, visit Chevron.com/Ecuador.
Court Orders Documentary Filmmaker to Hand Ecuador Footage to Chevron
Please go to link below to view or download documentary video.
The oil giant Chevron has been ordered to pay more than $17 billion in fines and punitive damages in a long-running case over environmental contamination in Ecuador.
Amazonian residents sued Texaco, which was then purchased by Chevron, for dumping billions of gallons of toxic oil waste into Ecuador’s rain forest since the 1970s. On Monday, an Ecuadorian judge ordered Chevron to pay an $8.6 billion fine and an equal amount in punitive damages.
It’s the second-largest total assessed for environmental damages behind the $20 billion compensation fund for BP’s Gulf Coast oil spill. Chevron has vowed to appeal, but it has also suggested it will not pay up under any circumstance, calling the ruling “illegitimate and unenforceable.”
The plaintiffs also say they plan to appeal because the damages are too low. Joining us to talk about the case is Andrew Miller with Amazon Watch. [includes rush transcript]
This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: The oil giant Chevron has been fined over $17 billion in a long-running case over environmental contamination in Ecuador.
Amazonian residents have sued Chevron for dumping billions of gallons of toxic oil waste into Ecuador’s rain forest since the ’70s. On Monday, an Ecuadorian judge ordered Chevron to pay an $8.6 billion fine and an equal amount in punitive damages.
It’s the second-largest total assessment for environmental damages, behind the $20 billion compensation fund for BP’s Gulf Coast oil spill. Under the ruling, the punitive damages would be waived if Chevron issues a public apology within 15 days.
Chevron has vowed to appeal, but it’s also suggested it won’t pay up under any circumstances, calling the ruling, quote, “illegitimate and unenforceable.”
The plaintiffs, meanwhile, say they plan to appeal, as well, because the damages are too low. On Monday, a spokesperson for the plaintiffs, Luis Lanza, reacted to the verdict.
LUIS LANZA: [translated] We are very happy. We are inspired to continue with the fight. However, yes, we express our disappointment in regards to the economic figure that the judge has given in his ruling. We believe that $8 billion that the judge has ruled does not meet our expectations based on tests and facts. It is not enough to cover the majority of damages or to repair said damages.
AMY GOODMAN: The ruling comes over 17 years after the case was first filed in a New York court. Chevron successfully fought to have it moved to Ecuador in 2003. In 2008, reports emerged that Chevron had lobbied the Bush administration to remove special trade preferences for Ecuador to pressure the Ecuadorian government to block the case.
Chevron has also filed counter-suits against the plaintiffs, their attorneys and the Ecuadorian government in U.S. courts and at The Hague.
For more on the case, we’re joined now from Washington, D.C., by Andrew Miller, the D.C. advocacy coordinator for Amazon Watch. We did ask Chevron to appear on the broadcast, but they declined our request.
So, Andrew, explain what the response is to the court’s ruling.
ANDREW MILLER: Well, Amy, thank you very much for having me on, and it’s really a pleasure, after 18 years, to be able to be announcing to your listeners and to your viewers that this historic judgment has come out. And it’s really a great day for the 30,000 plaintiffs in this case who have been seeking justice.
Of course, Chevron has been fighting this at every possible step. They’ve been fighting it in the courts. They’ve been trying to fight it, you know, in terms of public opinion.
They’ve been trying to fight it in political spheres, as you indicated. But finally, the Ecuadorian court system has agreed with what the plaintiffs have been saying for several decades, which is, essentially, that Chevron — well, Texaco, which is now owned by Chevron, over the course of two-and-a-half decades, it planned, created, implemented a system which systematically polluted in the Ecuadorian Amazon.
It left hundreds of toxic waste pits. It dumped billions of gallons of toxic waste. And really, the whole time that this trial has been going on over the course of 18 years, the communities continue to live with that legacy, and they continue to suffer the impacts, the health impacts, the cultural impacts, the environmental impacts of that destruction.
And so, this is an important day for the communities. It’s just one step; it’s not a victory. But it is very crucial for them. It’s also an important day for the broader struggle for corporate accountability around the world, for broader struggles for environmental justice and human rights.
AMY GOODMAN: I’m looking at an article from Bloomberg. It says, “Chevron [Corp.], the second-largest U.S. oil company, may never pay a cent of the more than $17 billion in fines and penalties levied by an Ecuadorean court for environmental damage… Chevron doesn’t have any refineries, storage terminals, oil wells or other properties in Ecuador that could be seized to pressure the company to pay, said Mark Gilman, an analyst at Benchmark Co. LLC in New York.
In anticipation of an adverse ruling, Chevron went to court in New York last week to obtain an order shielding the company anywhere in the world from collection efforts related to the case.” Your response, Andrew Miller?
ANDREW MILLER: Well, ultimately, we’re going to have to leave that up to the lawyers. There are going to be appeals in the Ecuadorian system. We know that. Both Chevron is going to appeal, to try to get the ruling thrown out, the plaintiffs are also going to appeal, because they don’t believe that the ruling, that the damages, are sufficient. So, that process is going to continue, we assume, in the months that come, in the years that come.
You know, but it’s important that the people who have been following this case — and I know you’ve been following it for years, and many others. Amazon Watch has been working on it for 10 years. Many other groups, Rainforest Action Network, Amnesty International, have been backing the plaintiffs in their case and the campaign in different ways.
So it’s obvious that we’re going to have to continue to wage this campaign well into the future. But this is still an important step. And again, not only in this case, but we assume that communities around the world are also listening to this, and, you know, we might be seeing other similar kinds of actions against corporations that have polluted and have contributed to human rights violations.
AMY GOODMAN: In Chevron’s statement, which they pointed us to rather than coming on, aside from saying that the court’s judgment is “illegitimate and unenforceable,” they say it’s “the product of fraud and is contrary to the legitimate scientific evidence.” They go on to say, “Chevron intends to see the perpetrators of this fraud are held accountable for [their] misconduct.” What exactly do they mean?
ANDREW MILLER: Well, I mean, essentially, Chevron is trying to play themselves off as the victim here, which is quite extraordinary, of course — one of the largest corporations in the world, you know, essentially against some of the most marginalized communities in the world, indigenous communities in the Ecuadorian Amazon. You know, and one of the extraordinary things here is that Chevron fought for years, actually, to have the jurisdiction moved from the United States to Ecuador.
And they claimed that they could get a fair trial there, they claimed that they could get a transparent trial, and they essentially agreed to accept whatever the decision was. So they fought for years to do that.
Also, the evidence that they’re talking of, I mean, the evidence that was used by the judge, is actually Chevron’s own evidence. The thousands of soil samples were carried out by the court, were carried out by experts that had been brought on by the plaintiffs, and also were carried out by scientists and experts that were brought on by Chevron.
So, the evidence in this judgment is actually Chevron’s own evidence. So it’s their evidence. It’s in the venue that they fought for for a long time. And, you know, I essentially think that Chevron doesn’t want this to happen in any jurisdiction, whether it’s the United States or Ecuador or anywhere around the world. Effectively, they believe that they’re above the law.
And, you know, the Ecuadorian communities that have been affected by their operations are saying otherwise.
AMY GOODMAN: How large a swath of land are we talking about in Ecuador, Andrew Miller?
ANDREW MILLER: Well, we’re talking about thousands of different acres. It’s worth mentioning that this is one of the most biodiverse areas in the world. I mean, where the Andes and the Amazon meet is a biodiversity hot spot.
It’s also the headwaters of the Amazon River, so when we’re talking about water pollution, the effect is not simply limited to these, you know, tens of thousands of acres that are being affected by ChevronTexaco’s former operating sites there, but it’s also all of the communities downstream. Of course, there are many other oil operators in the same part of the world that are also polluting.
We’re seeing a lot of oil spills in northern Peru right now, which are really the same rivers. So we can assume it’s also the communities all downstream, down the Amazon River, that are ultimately indirectly affected by these operations.
AMY GOODMAN: This is the first time indigenous people have sued a multinational corporation in the country where the crime was committed and won?
ANDREW MILLER: This is the first time, yeah, that we know of. So, in that sense, it’s very much historic. It’s not the only case, of course, that’s being brought against multinational corporations. There are similar cases.
I just mentioned in northern Peru, there’s a similar case from Achuar communities against Los Angeles-based Occidental Petroleum. That case is much in sort of earlier stages, and we expect a multi-year legal battle on that front, too.
But yeah, this is the first time that one of the largest corporations in the world is essentially and effectively being held accountable in a court system for past environmental damages, for human rights violations.
AMY GOODMAN: Andrew Miller, w
Texaco Sued Over Pollution Oil Waste Dumped
May 22, 2005
San Carlos, Ecuador – Texaco’s legacy in the Amazon oozes from an oil pit near Ruperto Narvaez’s shack like pus from a sore.
When the rains come, as they often do in this remote jungle town, black goo overflows from the pit into a nearby stream that serves as Narvaez’s main water source. Narvaez believes that’s why his cattle are sickly, why his cacao plants languish, and why his children suffer chronic headaches and skin rashes.
“The only things that grow here are sickness and misery,” said Narvaez, a scrawny farmer with a face creased by defeat, as he jabbed his machete into the muck. “When is someone going to clean this up?”
After a decade of legal logjams, Narvaez may finally get his answer. A landmark lawsuit slouching through an Ecuadoran court seeks $6 billion in cleanup funds from the former U.S. petroleum giant Texaco Inc., alleging it created Latin America’s worst environmental disaster when it dumped billions of gallons of oil waste into Ecuador’s Amazon rainforest from 1972 to 1990.
ChevronTexaco denies any wrongdoing and points out that health studies finding increased incidence of cancer, miscarriages and other problems are not conclusive. It notes the Ecuadoran government exonerated Texaco of any liability after it spent $40 million cleaning up more than one-third of its 627 oil pits in the area in the mid-1990s, equal to its share in the drilling consortium.
The unprecedented suit was filed on behalf of 80 communities and five indigenous groups in Ecuador’s Amazon, one of the world’s most fragile and environmentally diverse ecosystems.
A ruling for the plaintiffs “would be a wakeup call to corporations that have been, or continue to be, lax in developing countries,” said Eric Dannenmaier, director of the Institute for Environmental Law and Policy at Tulane University in New Orleans.
The lawsuit alleges that to save money, Texaco dumped more than 18 billion gallons of waste into pits, swamps, rivers and streams in an area the size of Rhode Island. The waste included an estimated 16 million gallons of crude oil, more than 1 ½ times the amount spilled in the Exxon Valdez disaster.
The actions suggest that “to certain decision-makers in Texaco, the lives of the people in the rainforest weren’t worth as much as the lives of people in their own country,” said Steven Donziger, a Manhattan-based attorney representing the plaintiffs. Such dumping practices were no longer the norm during the 1970s and 1980s in the United States, Donziger said.
Despite the seriousness of the charges, a carnival atmosphere sometimes pervades the trial, which began 1 ½ years ago and is expected to last well into next year. Most proceedings take place at Texaco’s former drilling and production sites.
Dressed in floppy sun hats and galoshes, lawyers, expert witnesses and the judge slosh through steamy jungle swamps to inspect oily ponds and separation pits.
Demonstrators – who have included such celebrities as Bianca Jagger, as well as bare-chested Amazon Indians decked in face-paint and brilliant feather headdresses – wave banners condemning “Chevron-Toxico.”
Both sides have resorted to grandstanding.
Plaintiffs’ lawyers label Texaco’s former drilling sites “The Rainforest Chernobyl” because of the volume of dumped waste and suspiciously high cancer rates in the company’s drilling areas, even though the sobering health and environmental problems in the area can’t compare with the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster.
ChevronTexaco, meanwhile, revels in such tactics as showing the judge a 10-foot-long map of massive spills by the Ecuadoran state oil company, Petroecuador, after it took over Texaco’s operations in 1990. The aim is to underscore ChevronTexaco’s argument that any contamination in its former drilling areas is the fault of its successor.
Whatever the outcome, the proceedings expose the risks of oil production in developing countries with little technical savvy or will to question powerful foreign corporations.
Ecuador was desperate for revenues from Texaco’s operations in the Ecuadoran Amazon, which represented more than half its gross national product at the time. Discovery documents show that “Tex-AH-co,” as Ecuadorans call the company, sweetened that relationship further by lavishing former government officials with contracts and designing the entire oil extraction system for the region, virgin territory so wild and remote it is still known simply as “El Oriente” (“The East”).
“The government trusted Texaco to do the right thing, and it betrayed that trust,” said Atossa Soltani, executive director of the environmental group Amazon Watch.
ChevronTexaco officials counter that if any contamination did occur during Texaco’s time in the Oriente, it was the responsibility of Petroecuador because it owned nearly two-thirds of the Texaco consortium.
“Petroecuador directed and controlled every step of our operations,” said Rodrigo Perez, a lawyer for ChevronTexaco.
That’s one reason ChevronTexaco has asked a U.S.-based arbitration panel to transfer any liability for further cleanup costs to Petroecuador. Ecuador obtained an injunction that temporarily blocks ChrevonTexaco’s request. However, should ChevronTexaco prevail in arbitration, some political observers fear the Ecuadoran government might pressure its courts to not issue any damage judgment to avoid having to foot the cleanup bill.
Some discovery documents provided by the plaintiffs in the 10-year-old lawsuit suggest Texaco was indeed running the show during its years in Ecuador.
In 1976, Texaco rebuffed Ecuadoran government requests that it close and replace several unlined oil pits whose embankments were breaking, causing polluted waste to spill onto surrounding areas. It opted instead to reinforce the pits because the government’s proposals would be “prohibitive.”
Texaco is estimated to have earned a total of $30 billion from its operations in the Oriente.
Home to few but missionaries and indigenous tribes in the 1970s, the Oriente still boasts a wild and potent beauty. Tropical flowers and fruit trees that burst from the jungle defy the notion of total contamination.
Nevertheless, the region has been indelibly branded by Texaco’s operations. Pipelines cut through dozens of communities. Gas flames shoot into the sky from processing plants hacked out of jungle foliage. Hundreds of open pits filled with oil waste litter the landscape.
Lured by Texaco’s roads and jobs as well as by generous government homesteading programs, settlers flocked to the region to raze trees and raise cattle, driving indigenous groups farther into the jungle and pushing some, according to plaintiffs, to the verge of extinction.
Like the Indians, the settlers bathed in and drank the water in which Texaco was dumping its wastes. They planted their crops and let their cattle graze on soil that barely covered some of the oil pits, and let their children play in the sticky mud.
“We didn’t know any better. Every day, we poisoned ourselves a little more,” said Rosana Sisalima, a fragile woman of 65 who settled in San Carlos with her husband in the early 1980s.
Doctors removed Sisalima’s uterus a few years ago because of cancer; her husband died of stomach cancer in 1990. Sisalima blames both malignancies on the Texaco waste. So do many other residents with health problems in San Carlos, a community with 3,000 people and 30 Texaco wells.
In the past 12 years, at least three international studies of Texaco’s drilling areas in the Oriente found suspiciously high rates of cancer, miscarriages, birth defects and skin diseases – findings corroborated by local doctors.
However, as ChevronTexaco points out, none of the health studies is conclusive. Moreover, the company argues, much soil and water in the area appear to be contaminated by pesticides, sewage or subsequent oil operations in the same area by Petroecuador.
On a recent visit to the Oriente, Petroecuador’s environmental track record appeared far from exemplary. Numerous residents in San Carlos said Petroecuador’s trucks dump oil wastes along roadsides at night – allegations the company denies, though it has acknowledged scores of spills in recent years.
During an inspection of the Sacha Central Production plant in February as part of the case against Texaco, a Petroecuador truck drove up and, in front of the judge, disgorged a load of drilling waste into a pit that fed into a stream rather than reinjecting it deep into the ground, the method considered environmentally safer.
Plaintiffs contend that Texaco should have reinjected its waste in the Oriente, too. Reinjection was already standard procedure by the 1970s in the United States, and Texaco even participated in a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency panel touting the practice in 1971, they argue. But reinjection would have cost Texaco an extra $4.5 billion over two decades.
The company is proud to show reporters some of the sites it remediated under orders from Ecuador in 1995-98. On one, for example, an open pit filled with drilling mud had been transformed into a field with plants and banana trees.
But the trees’ owner, Teresa Vasquez, a mother of three whose house is just yards from the site, insisted the soil is still contaminated. “Just look at the trees: They don’t grow tall and the leaves get yellow,” she said, pointing to some withering foliage. “We’d like to move, but who would buy this land from us now?”
Even ChevronTexaco’s recent soil tests from several areas Texaco remediated show current levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons – toxic chemicals derived from petroleum – that are more than 1,000 times higher than Ecuadoran limits.
ChevronTexaco officials note that Ecuador established those limits long after Texaco’s remediation and said it would be unjust to apply them retroactively. Environmental law experts, however, say numerous legal precedents exist for applying current standards to past remediation.
In a region scarred by poverty and government neglect, blame may lie on many fronts. For example, tens of thousands of Oriente residents wouldn’t be bathing in, and sometimes drinking from, contaminated streams and rivers if the Ecuadoran government had expanded its scarce public drinking-water supplies.
“The river water is dirty, but it’s this or nothing,” said Nelly Surita, a mother of three, as she stood in a river in San Carlos, washing clothes. Around her, several school boys dove into the water as a respite from the tropical sun.
Surita suspects bathing in the river made her 8-year-old daughter’s hair start falling out in clumps. Still, she wants oil drilling to continue in the Oriente to keep jobs in the region. “They just need to take care of the waste,” she said.
Narvaez, 65, who moved here 15 years ago in search of cheap, fertile land, only to end up with an oozing oil pit, wonders if that will happen in his lifetime.
“This land was supposed to change our lives,” he said. “But not for worse.”
Distributed by the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service
You Should See What This Woman Sees Every Day. It Is Messed Up!
September 29, 2014 by Sophie McAdam
Life on earth would not be possible without freshwater and oxygen created by places like the Amazon, ´the lungs of the world´. The ongoing destruction of the rainforest is a bi-partisan issue: the future of humanity depends on not burning two-thirds of our oil reserves. In this video made by Amazon Watch, a girl pleads for change.
“Equador is not going to get out of poverty just because they come and drill for oil in the Amazon,” she says. “Equador is going to lose the only rainforest that we have left. It´s going to destroy cultures, the environment, and kill plants and animals…That´s not getting out of poverty.”
Hear hear. Please share this video if you agree and would like to join her call for change.
SIGN THE PETITION TO KEEP THE OIL IN THE GROUND IN THE AMAZON: http://amazonwatch.org/take-action/keep-the-oil-in-the-ground-in-the-amazon
CONTRIBUTE TO OUR WORK: https://amazonwatch.org/donate
Humanity’s survival depends on not burning two-thirds of our global oil reserves, so we must act now by limiting fossil fuel extraction. The highly biodiverse Amazon basin is a keystone area in combating climate change because it regulates our planet’s health and drives global weather patterns.
Preserving regions most critical for our survival—from the Amazon to the Arctic—is the solution to avoiding climate chaos. That’s why we are globally calling to KEEP THE OIL IN THE GROUND, starting with the Amazon.
Please, act today and share this video with everyone you know who likes to breathe air.
Director and Producer: Barry Pousman
Executive Producer: Gabo Arora
Narration: Jason Silva
Animation by Ian Dokie and team – http://youtube.com/lifenoggin
Music by Dexter Britain – https://soundcloud.com/dexterbritain
Special thanks to Brigid Mary Prain for Yasuni animal footage.
Special thanks to El Maizal for the marcha de mujeres footage in Ecuador.
STOP CLIMATE ECOCIDE 350 Richmond Chevron Protest
RICHMOND — More than 2,000 people marched Saturday through the streets of Richmond to the gates of the Chevron refinery, where 210 people were arrested as part of a protest against the oil giant and other fossil fuel companies.
Chanting “arrest Chevron,” protesters sat in front of the refinery gates before being handcuffed by police in riot gear. The event was scheduled to mark the anniversary of the Aug. 6 explosion and fire at the refinery that generated a huge plume of black smoke and sent 15,000 people to hospitals complaining of breathing problems.
The showdown was about more than one local community’s battle with its largest employer and biggest polluter, however. It represents the latest example of a fast-growing movement by environmentalists across the United States to organize rallies, marches and civil disobedience for more action to reduce greenhouse emissions
“The pace is picking up very dramatically,” said Bill McKibben, one of the event organizers.
McKibben is a Vermont writer who cofounded the nonprofit group 350.org, which has organized thousands of similar events in the past five years. He was among the first people arrested Saturday. McKibben said protests are increasing because people are frustrated that Congress has not passed national laws to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the coal, oil and other fossil fuel industries despite overwhelming scientific evidence that the planet is warming.
http://350.org where we are changing the odds Come Join US!
The Bill Mckibben quotes are from his speech at Power Shift 2011
Animation of Fire at Chevron’s Richmond Refinery, August 6, 2012
Published on Apr 19, 2013
Clip reel: Chevron shareholder meeting protest – May 29, 2013
Video clips from demonstation at the 2013 Chevron Annual Shareholder Meeting. Report back from Servio Curipoma from Ecuador. Join the call to FIRE CEO John Watson at: http://truecostofchevron.com
Amazonia: The Rainforest and the City (full documentary)
In this chapter we will witness the thousand conversations and encountersof the forest with urban life.
The fight with the jungle against the city is clear: millions of people are inhabiting the banks of the Amazon River in subhuman conditions and this has serious consequences for your health. Living with dangerous enemies, as the Anopheles mosquito or the vampire bat.
We will see other cases in which the inhabitants of the Amazonian cities live new experiences thanks to gifts of nature testing substance psychoactive as Ayahuasca.
We will meet Tikunas and Kayapó Indians. With them we will know a white male who was kidnapped by the Indians as a child and now lives as one.
Don’t forget to SUBSCRIBE here for more amazing docs!: http://goo.gl/vNINO4
We will also be raising a toast to our executive director and founder, Atossa Soltani, for being named the 2013 Hillary Institute Laureate, for her leadership on climate equity and the work of Amazon Watch.
And we will learn of our efforts in Peru, Ecuador, Brazil & Colombia to continue protecting the Amazon and supporting the rights of indigenous peoples.
Join us to celebrate our achievements for the people and rainforests of the Amazon!
ps – Tweet #AmazonWatchLive during the event to join the conversation.